Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

1 Answer

The question doesn’t give any context, so, since this is about continuity my guess is that it involves a mathematical definition of continuity. Let’s say there’s a function represented by f(x). For example, if y=3x²+4, then f(x)=3x²+4. This function is continuous because if we change x by a small amount, y changes by a small amount, no matter what x actually is. So the value of x is arbitrary. We can represent this arbitrary value as “a”. So, when x=a, y=3a²+4 or f(a)=3a²+4. And we can also say that if x is near to a, or, the limit of f(x) as x approaches a (normally written as Lim as x→a) is 3a²+4. If a=2, then this limit would be 16. 

Now we come to the bit you’re having a problem with. If we don’t know a how can we work this out? The answer is, we don’t have to know a because a is arbitrary (a = arbitrary). It’s part of the domain (all values that x can take) so any value will do, because we are testing to see if the function itself is continuous over all the values x can take. What we’re saying is: a function is DEFINED as being CONTINUOUS, IF, as x approaches an ARBITRARY value a, f(x) approaches a certain value L. In the example L would be 16 if a=2; but I could have picked a=1, so L=7; if a=100, L=30004. We don’t need to put an actual value for a or L, because we are talking about the function as a whole—continuity is a property of a function, not of any particular part of it.

Now, consider the opposite of continuity: discontinuity. For example, f(x)=1/(1-x). It’s discontinuous because it’s not true that for ANY arbitrary value a there is a certain value L for which we can say Lim as x→a f(x)=L. Why? Because if a=1, we can’t define f(x). Other values of a are OK, but this one value a=1 doesn’t work, so the function isn’t continuous. It also means that, since we can’t calculate f(1), a small change in x doesn’t equate to a small change in f(1) (close to L). In other words we can’t define L.

I hope this resolves your confusion.



by Top Rated User (775k points)

Related questions

1 answer
Welcome to, where students, teachers and math enthusiasts can ask and answer any math question. Get help and answers to any math problem including algebra, trigonometry, geometry, calculus, trigonometry, fractions, solving expression, simplifying expressions and more. Get answers to math questions. Help is always 100% free!
85,246 questions
90,478 answers
79,618 users