The population of a city has been growing exponentially. The data table shows the city population in thousands over a 40 year period.

 

Year

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

Population (thousands)

 

219.5

 

268.0

 

326.5

 

397.5

 

485.0

 

a) Determine the exponential equation that models this data. [2]

b) Use your equation (or curve of best fit) to estimate the population in 2015, to the nearest hundred people. [2] Show your work.

in Other Math Topics by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

1 Answer

Let p(y)=aeby+c. When y=1970 we want p(1970)=219.5, so if a=219.5 then 1970b+c=0, c=-1970b.

So p(y)=219.5eby-1970b or 219.5eb(y-1970).

Now we have to find b. Let’s take the population of two consecutive decades:

y=1970, p(1970)=219.5.

y=1980, p(1980)=268.0.

p(1980)/p(1970)=e1980b+c/e1970b+c=e10b=268/219.5=1.2210.

10b=ln(1.221)=0.2, so b=0.02.

We have taken the ratio of the populations of 1970 and 1980. We need to consider populations from other years to be sure there’s constant growth.

So 326.5/268=1.2183, 397.5/326.5=1.2175, 485/397.5=1.2201.

They’re all fairly close to one another, so b=0.02 is a fair estimate.

We could simply take logs of each population and compare them:

ln(219.5)=5.3914, ln(268)=5.5910, ln(326.5)=5.7884, ln(397.5)=5.9852, ln(485)=6.1841.

There’s a common difference of about 0.20, but if we take the average difference we get 0.1982. ln(1.2192)=0.1982=10b, b=0.01982, so the average ratio of the decade populations is 1.2192. Let’s see what b=0.02 predicts (to the nearest 0.5):

1970 219.5

1980 268.0

1990 327.5

2000 400.0

2010 488.5

2015 540.0

Compare with b=0.01982:

1970 219.5

1980 267.5

1990 326.5

2000 398.0

2010 485.0

2015 535.5

The second model fits better than the first, so:

(a) p(y)=219.5e0.01982(y-1970) is a good model.

(b) prediction for 2015 using model in (a) is population (thousands) = 535.5

Another way of looking at this problem is to consider a geometric series where the first term is a, the next term is ar, then ar2, ar3, etc. So a would be 219.5 and r would be the average increasing rate. The data shows decades and we are asked to predict the population for 2015, which is not a decade. So r has to be the rate of increase of no more than 5 years. If we make r the annual increase, then the series would be a, ar10, ar20, ar30, etc. But we need to relate these exponents to the actual year, so we get ary-1970. We already know that r10=1.2192. From this 10ln(r)=ln(1.2192)=0.1982, so ln(r)=0.01982, making r=1.02 (about 2% per year). So p(y)=219.5(1.02)y-1970. Lets try it out:

1970 219.5

1980 267.5

1990 326.0

2000 397.5

2010 484.5

2015 535.0

(To the nearest 0.5 thousands, that is, to the nearest 500). The model fits well.

by Top Rated User (1.2m points)

Related questions

1 answer
asked Oct 29, 2011 in Pre-Algebra Answers by anonymous | 638 views
0 answers
1 answer
2 answers
asked Sep 30, 2013 in Algebra 2 Answers by Anisa832 Level 1 User (120 points) | 932 views
1 answer
asked Aug 14, 2013 in Algebra 1 Answers by shalon977 Level 2 User (1.1k points) | 775 views
1 answer
asked Oct 7, 2012 in Algebra 1 Answers by anonymous | 630 views
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
asked Jun 29, 2021 by Kaela | 419 views
1 answer
2 answers
asked Jul 11, 2013 in Algebra 1 Answers by T | 532 views
Welcome to MathHomeworkAnswers.org, where students, teachers and math enthusiasts can ask and answer any math question. Get help and answers to any math problem including algebra, trigonometry, geometry, calculus, trigonometry, fractions, solving expression, simplifying expressions and more. Get answers to math questions. Help is always 100% free!
87,516 questions
100,279 answers
2,420 comments
732,006 users